LOWV vs. UJUN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LOWV (AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF) and UJUN (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. LOWV is actively managed, while UJUN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LOWV returned 15.49%/yr vs 11.26%/yr for UJUN. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LOWV charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UJUN.

Performance

LOWV vs. UJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOWV achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly lower than UJUN's 3.32% return.

LOWV

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 2.73%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 10.86%
• 3Y*: 15.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UJUN

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 6M: 4.16%
• 1Y: 10.04%
• 3Y*: 11.26%
• 5Y*: 6.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOWV vs. UJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF	2.73%	12.26%	20.43%	20.41%
UJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June	3.32%	10.63%	12.49%	11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between LOWV and UJUN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023	0.83

The correlation between LOWV and UJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

LOWV vs. UJUN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LOWV	UJUN
Technology	32.6%	36.2%
Financial Services	14.9%	11.9%
Healthcare	11.4%	8.4%
Communication Services	9.7%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	10.1%
Industrials	7.4%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	4.9%
Utilities	4.8%	2.3%
Energy	2.4%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

LOWV vs. UJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOWV

LOWV Risk / Return Rank: 28
LOWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
LOWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LOWV Omega Ratio Rank: 27
LOWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
LOWV Martin Ratio Rank: 31

UJUN

UJUN Risk / Return Rank: 81
UJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
UJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
UJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
UJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
UJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOWV vs. UJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOWV	UJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	2.40	-1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	3.66	-2.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.55	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	3.55	-2.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.65	21.84	-17.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOWV vs. UJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOWV Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the UJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOWV and UJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOWV	UJUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	2.40	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.47	0.77	+0.70

Drawdowns

LOWV vs. UJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOWV drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, roughly equal to the maximum UJUN drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWV and UJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOWV	UJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.87%	-13.73%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-2.84%	-6.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.87%	-11.24%	-2.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-0.30%	-0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-2.07%	+0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	0.46%	+1.88%

Volatility

LOWV vs. UJUN - Volatility Comparison

AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) has a higher volatility of 2.17% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN) at 0.41%. This indicates that LOWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOWV	UJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.17%	0.41%	+1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.89%	3.25%	+4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.47%	4.25%	+6.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.95%	8.32%	+3.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.95%	8.77%	+3.18%

LOWV vs. UJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOWV has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than UJUN's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOWV vs. UJUN - Dividend Comparison

LOWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while UJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF	0.91%	0.85%	0.92%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOWV and UJUN in my portfolio?

LOWV and UJUN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOWV or UJUN?

LOWV has higher volatility (2.17%) compared to UJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOWV dropped -13.87% vs UJUN's -13.73%.

Which ETF is better, LOWV or UJUN?

On 3-year performance, LOWV leads with 15.49% vs 11.26% for UJUN. On fees, LOWV is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, UJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LOWV or UJUN?

Over the 3-year period, LOWV has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 11.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOWV or UJUN?

LOWV is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOWV or UJUN?

LOWV has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for UJUN.

What is the main difference between LOWV and UJUN?

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for LOWV and 0.79% for UJUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.