LOWV vs. TMUS
LOWV (AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, LOWV returned 15.19%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for TMUS. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LOWV vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOWV achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's -11.22% return.
LOWV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMUS
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- YTD
- -11.22%
- 6M
- -11.83%
- 1Y
- -26.06%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
LOWV vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 1.77% | 12.26% | 20.43% | 20.41% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -11.22% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 12.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOWV and TMUS is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023 | 0.16 |
The correlation between LOWV and TMUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOWV vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank
LOWV
TMUS
LOWV vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOWV | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.83 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | -0.86 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.70 | -1.49 | +5.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOWV | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | -1.05 | +1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.20 | +1.23 |
Drawdowns
LOWV vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOWV drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, smaller than the maximum TMUS drawdown of -86.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWV and TMUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOWV | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | -86.29% | +72.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -30.37% | +20.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.87% | -33.65% | +19.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -33.12% | +31.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -25.96% | +24.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 17.64% | -15.29% |
Volatility
LOWV vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) is 2.51%, while T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that LOWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOWV | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 6.91% | -4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.00% | 19.14% | -11.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.54% | 25.04% | -14.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.96% | 23.86% | -11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.96% | 26.08% | -14.12% |
Dividends
LOWV vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison
LOWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than TMUS's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 0.92% | 0.85% | 0.92% | 0.77% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.21% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOWV and TMUS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMUS has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to LOWV (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOWV dropped -13.87% vs TMUS's -86.29%.
LOWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOWV and TMUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer