LOWV vs. EIVPX
LOWV (AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF) and EIVPX (Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund) are both funds - LOWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while EIVPX is a Options Trading fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 3 years, LOWV returned 15.49%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for EIVPX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LOWV charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for EIVPX.
Performance
LOWV vs. EIVPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOWV achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly lower than EIVPX's 6.40% return.
LOWV
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- 10.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIVPX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 6M
- 7.07%
- 1Y
- 18.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- —
LOWV vs. EIVPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 2.73% | 12.26% | 20.43% | 20.41% |
EIVPX Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund | 6.40% | 12.90% | 16.45% | 13.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOWV and EIVPX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between LOWV and EIVPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOWV vs. EIVPX — Risk / Return Rank
LOWV
EIVPX
LOWV vs. EIVPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOWV | EIVPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.63 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 4.93 | -3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 26.31 | -21.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOWV | EIVPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 2.95 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 0.78 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
LOWV vs. EIVPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOWV drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, smaller than the maximum EIVPX drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWV and EIVPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOWV | EIVPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | -26.67% | +12.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -3.81% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.87% | -12.77% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | 0.00% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -2.46% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 0.71% | +1.63% |
Volatility
LOWV vs. EIVPX - Volatility Comparison
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) has a higher volatility of 2.17% compared to Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX) at 0.93%. This indicates that LOWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIVPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOWV | EIVPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 0.93% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 4.71% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 6.38% | +4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.95% | 9.79% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.95% | 11.81% | +0.14% |
LOWV vs. EIVPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOWV has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than EIVPX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOWV vs. EIVPX - Dividend Comparison
LOWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than EIVPX's 3.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIVPX Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund | 3.77% | 4.01% | 2.67% | 5.09% | 7.95% | 1.22% | 0.75% | 1.23% | 1.24% | 0.53% |
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 0.91% | 0.85% | 0.92% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOWV and EIVPX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOWV has higher volatility (2.17%) compared to EIVPX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOWV dropped -13.87% vs EIVPX's -26.67%.
EIVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOWV and EIVPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer