LOWV vs. CPLS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS).

LOWV and CPLS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LOWV is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Mar 21, 2023. CPLS is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023.

Performance

LOWV vs. CPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LOWV vs. CPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF	-5.53%	12.26%	20.43%	-0.05%
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF	-0.04%	6.91%	1.65%	1.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOWV achieves a -5.53% return, which is significantly lower than CPLS's -0.04% return.

LOWV

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: -5.35%
• YTD: -5.53%
• 6M: -5.60%
• 1Y: 6.95%
• 3Y*: 14.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CPLS

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: -0.04%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 4.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOWV vs. CPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOWV has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than CPLS's 0.33% expense ratio.

LOWV

AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF

CPLS

AB Core Plus Bond ETF

Return for Risk

LOWV vs. CPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOWV

LOWV Risk / Return Rank: 28
LOWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
LOWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LOWV Omega Ratio Rank: 27
LOWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
LOWV Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CPLS

CPLS Risk / Return Rank: 56
CPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
CPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOWV vs. CPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOWV	CPLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	1.02	-0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	1.45	-0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.19	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	1.77	-1.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.68	5.62	-2.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOWV vs. CPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOWV Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the CPLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOWV and CPLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOWV	CPLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	1.02	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	0.88	+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between LOWV and CPLS is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LOWV vs. CPLS - Dividend Comparison

LOWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than CPLS's 4.68% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF	0.99%	0.85%	0.92%	0.77%
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF	4.68%	4.66%	4.71%	0.23%

Drawdowns

LOWV vs. CPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOWV drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, which is greater than CPLS's maximum drawdown of -4.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWV and CPLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOWV	CPLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.87%	-4.43%	-9.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.23%	-2.65%	-7.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.32%	-1.59%	-5.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-1.25%	-0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	0.84%	+1.74%

Volatility

LOWV vs. CPLS - Volatility Comparison

AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) at 1.76%. This indicates that LOWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOWV	CPLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	1.76%	+2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.34%	2.58%	+5.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.88%	4.43%	+10.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.09%	4.86%	+7.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.09%	4.86%	+7.23%