PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOWD.DE vs. ESAE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOWD.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESAE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOWD.DE achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly lower than ESAE.DE's 12.72% return.


LOWD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.75%
6M
9.87%
YTD
8.75%
1Y
11.96%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.79%

ESAE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.45%
6M
10.98%
YTD
12.72%
1Y
18.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
€30.33K€23.68K€29.24K
€29.65K€22.31K€17.68K

LOWD.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LOWD.DE and ESAE.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025

0.79

The correlation between LOWD.DE and ESAE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOWD.DE vs. ESAE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LOWD.DE
LOWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LOWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ESAE.DE
ESAE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ESAE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESAE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESAE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ESAE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESAE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LOWD.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESAE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOWD.DEESAE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.32

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

2.73

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

10.60

-6.30

LOWD.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOWD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the ESAE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOWD.DE and ESAE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOWD.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.08%, which is greater than ESAE.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWD.DE and ESAE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOWD.DEESAE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.08%

-6.70%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-6.70%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

-0.68%

-5.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-1.09%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.73%

+1.05%

Volatility

LOWD.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESAE.DE) at 2.72%. This indicates that LOWD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESAE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOWD.DEESAE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

2.72%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

7.76%

+3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.29%

11.31%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

11.01%

+3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.23%

11.01%

+3.22%

LOWD.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOWD.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ESAE.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOWD.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOWD.DE nor ESAE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LOWD.DE and ESAE.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESAE.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESAE.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOWD.DE.

LOWD.DE tracks Low Carbon 300 World PAB, while ESAE.DE tracks MSCI World Equal Weighted Ex Business Involvement Screens Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOWD.DE and 0.20% for ESAE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOWD.DE and ESAE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer