LOW vs. PDBC
LOW (Lowe's Companies, Inc.) is a stock, while PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) is Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, LOW returned 11.84%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LOW vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOW achieves a -13.07% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 27.55% return. Over the past 10 years, LOW has outperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 11.84%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.
LOW
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -5.92%
- 6M
- -22.61%
- YTD
- -13.07%
- 1Y
- -5.51%
- 3Y*
- -1.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
PDBC
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 22.82%
- YTD
- 27.55%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
LOW vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | -13.07% | -0.33% | 13.01% | 14.03% | -21.49% | 63.34% | 36.40% | 32.23% | 1.22% | 33.29% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 27.55% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOW and PDBC is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.12 |
The correlation between LOW and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.12 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOW vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
LOW
PDBC
LOW vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOW | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.28 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 1.86 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 6.57 | -6.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOW vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOW drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOW and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOW | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -49.52% | -13.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.75% | -16.55% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.75% | -16.55% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.86% | -27.63% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.63% | -40.73% | -7.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.38% | -10.63% | -16.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -23.11% | +6.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.88% | 4.69% | +9.19% |
Volatility
LOW vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 6.25%. This indicates that LOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOW | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 6.25% | +2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.33% | 16.77% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.84% | 18.90% | +7.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.49% | 19.24% | +7.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 17.76% | +11.50% |
Dividends
LOW vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
LOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than PDBC's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | 2.31% | 1.95% | 1.82% | 1.93% | 1.86% | 1.08% | 1.40% | 1.72% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.77% | 1.34% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.01% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOW and PDBC have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOW has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to PDBC (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOW dropped -62.52% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOW and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer