LOW vs. LEG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

LOW (Lowe's Companies, Inc.) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — LOW in Home Improvement Retail, LEG in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances. Over the past 10 years, LOW returned 12.33%/yr vs -11.64%/yr for LEG. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LOW vs. LEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOW achieves a -12.96% return, which is significantly lower than LEG's -8.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LOW has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 12.33%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.64% annualized return.

LOW

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -9.26%
• YTD: -12.96%
• 6M: -14.26%
• 1Y: -5.86%
• 3Y*: 1.78%
• 5Y*: 3.71%
• 10Y*: 12.33%

LEG

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: -8.64%
• 6M: -8.50%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: -29.34%
• 5Y*: -25.68%
• 10Y*: -11.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOW vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc.	-12.96%	-0.33%	13.01%	14.03%	-21.49%	63.34%	36.40%	32.23%	1.22%	33.29%
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated	-8.64%	17.02%	-61.93%	-13.45%	-17.78%	-3.76%	-9.05%	47.13%	-22.25%	0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between LOW and LEG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987	0.40

The correlation between LOW and LEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LOW : $116.46B LEG : $1.41B
EPS LOW : $11.86 LEG : $1.60
PE Ratio LOW : 17.54 LEG : 6.25
PS Ratio LOW : 1.32 LEG : 0.46
Total Revenue (TTM) LOW : $88.43B LEG : $3.03B
Gross Profit (TTM) LOW : $29.89B LEG : $717.40M
EBITDA (TTM) LOW : $11.50B LEG : $433.10M

Return for Risk

LOW vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOW

LOW Risk / Return Rank: 31
LOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
LOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
LOW Omega Ratio Rank: 28
LOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
LOW Martin Ratio Rank: 33

LEG

LEG Risk / Return Rank: 51
LEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
LEG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
LEG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOW vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOW	LEG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	0.25	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.16	0.77	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.09	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	0.43	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.49	0.89	-1.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOW vs. LEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOW Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the LEG Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOW and LEG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOW	LEG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	0.25	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	-0.61	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	-0.29	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.20	+0.26

Drawdowns

LOW vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOW drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOW and LEG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOW	LEG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.52%	-86.41%	+23.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.75%	-28.51%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.75%	-77.39%	+49.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.86%	-85.42%	+51.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.63%	-86.41%	+37.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.29%	-78.87%	+51.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.60%	-19.63%	+3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.96%	13.58%	-1.62%

Volatility

LOW vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is 6.36%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 11.27%. This indicates that LOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOW	LEG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.36%	11.27%	-4.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.88%	30.79%	-10.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.77%	49.55%	-23.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.15%	42.40%	-16.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.14%	39.77%	-10.63%

Dividends

LOW vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison

LOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than LEG's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated	2.00%	1.82%	6.35%	6.95%	5.40%	4.03%	3.61%	3.11%	4.19%	2.98%	2.74%	3.00%
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc.	2.31%	1.95%	1.82%	1.93%	1.86%	1.08%	1.40%	1.72%	1.93%	1.64%	1.77%	1.34%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOW and LEG in my portfolio?

LOW and LEG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOW or LEG?

LEG has higher volatility (11.27%) compared to LOW (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOW dropped -62.52% vs LEG's -86.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.