PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOUP vs. KSEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOUP vs. KSEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOUP achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than KSEP's 9.07% return.


LOUP

1D
-1.87%
1M
18.57%
YTD
28.21%
6M
26.83%
1Y
75.49%
3Y*
37.37%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*

KSEP

1D
0.13%
1M
1.74%
YTD
9.07%
6M
9.85%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOUP vs. KSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LOUP and KSEP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.68

The correlation between LOUP and KSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOUP vs. KSEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOUP
LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

KSEP
KSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
KSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
KSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOUP vs. KSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOUPKSEPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.66

2.17

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

3.28

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

4.62

-1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.23

16.76

-4.52

LOUP vs. KSEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOUP Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the KSEP Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOUP and KSEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOUPKSEPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.17

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.04

-0.45

Drawdowns

LOUP vs. KSEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOUP drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than KSEP's maximum drawdown of -14.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOUP and KSEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOUPKSEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-14.92%

-43.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.00%

-4.75%

-16.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

0.00%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.04%

-2.46%

-17.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.19%

1.31%

+4.88%

Volatility

LOUP vs. KSEP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) at 1.64%. This indicates that LOUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOUPKSEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

1.64%

+6.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.94%

6.29%

+15.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.51%

10.15%

+18.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.38%

11.66%

+20.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.96%

11.66%

+20.30%

LOUP vs. KSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KSEP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOUP vs. KSEP - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOUP nor KSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LOUP and KSEP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOUP has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to KSEP (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOUP dropped -58.68% vs KSEP's -14.92%.

On 1-year performance, LOUP leads with 75.49% vs 21.98% for KSEP. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 75.49% return vs 21.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KSEP.

LOUP and KSEP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

LOUP is categorized as Technology Equities, while KSEP is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LOUP and 0.79% for KSEP.

LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOUP and KSEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer