LOUP vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - LOUP tracks the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LOUP returned 37.54%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for KROP. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOUP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

LOUP vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOUP achieves a 29.15% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.59% return.

LOUP

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 15.35%
• YTD: 29.15%
• 6M: 27.05%
• 1Y: 75.12%
• 3Y*: 37.54%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 0.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOUP vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	29.15%	43.24%	21.80%	51.31%	-46.00%	3.51%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.59%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between LOUP and KROP is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021	0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between LOUP and KROP has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LOUP vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LOUP	KROP
Technology	51.0%	-
Industrials	20.0%	39.7%
Communication Services	10.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.5%	0.3%
Financial Services	4.5%	-
Energy	2.9%	-
Utilities	2.8%	-
Healthcare	2.7%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	32.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	26.3%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

LOUP vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOUP

LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 73
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 23
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOUP vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOUP	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	0.81	+1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	1.24	+1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.15	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	1.14	+2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.17	2.58	+9.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOUP vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOUP Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOUP and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOUP	KROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	0.81	+1.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	-0.57	+1.16

Drawdowns

LOUP vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOUP drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOUP and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOUP	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.68%	-61.96%	+3.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.00%	-11.29%	-9.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.23%	-28.70%	-6.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-48.93%	+47.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.03%	-44.50%	+24.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.19%	4.99%	+1.20%

Volatility

LOUP vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.69%. This indicates that LOUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOUP	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.74%	4.69%	+3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.94%	11.98%	+9.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.50%	16.04%	+12.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.38%	22.27%	+10.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.96%	22.27%	+9.69%

LOUP vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOUP vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

LOUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.34%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOUP and KROP in my portfolio?

LOUP and KROP have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOUP or KROP?

LOUP has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to KROP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOUP dropped -58.68% vs KROP's -61.96%.

Which ETF is better, LOUP or KROP?

On 3-year performance, LOUP leads with 37.54% vs 0.72% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LOUP or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 37.54% return vs 0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOUP or KROP?

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LOUP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOUP or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.00% for LOUP.

What is the main difference between LOUP and KROP?

LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LOUP and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.