LOUP vs. CIF
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF).
LOUP is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2018. CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988. Both LOUP and CIF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LOUP vs. CIF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LOUP vs. CIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | -9.90% | 43.24% | 21.80% | 51.31% | -46.00% | 7.54% | 86.25% | 31.76% | -19.72% |
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -2.21% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -10.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOUP achieves a -9.90% return, which is significantly lower than CIF's -2.21% return.
LOUP
- 1D
- 5.39%
- 1M
- -8.01%
- YTD
- -9.90%
- 6M
- -6.82%
- 1Y
- 51.60%
- 3Y*
- 24.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- —
CIF
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LOUP vs. CIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CIF's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LOUP vs. CIF — Risk / Return Rank
LOUP
CIF
LOUP vs. CIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOUP | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 0.38 | +1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 0.60 | +1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.09 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 0.51 | +1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 1.92 | +6.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOUP | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 0.38 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.05 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.16 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between LOUP and CIF is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LOUP vs. CIF - Dividend Comparison
LOUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.96% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
Drawdowns
LOUP vs. CIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOUP drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, smaller than the maximum CIF drawdown of -69.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOUP and CIF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOUP | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -69.23% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.00% | -9.68% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.63% | -44.92% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.74% | -23.30% | +6.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.42% | -17.80% | -2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.07% | 2.65% | +3.42% |
Volatility
LOUP vs. CIF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a higher volatility of 10.91% compared to MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) at 5.35%. This indicates that LOUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LOUP | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.91% | 5.35% | +5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.85% | 7.87% | +13.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.07% | 13.40% | +21.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.19% | 16.85% | +15.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.98% | 19.43% | +12.55% |