LOUP vs. BOUT
LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) and BOUT (Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index, while BOUT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LOUP returned 12.98%/yr vs 8.25%/yr for BOUT. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOUP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BOUT.
Performance
LOUP vs. BOUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOUP achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly lower than BOUT's 31.39% return.
LOUP
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 18.57%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 26.83%
- 1Y
- 75.49%
- 3Y*
- 37.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- —
BOUT
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 31.39%
- 6M
- 30.30%
- 1Y
- 35.27%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP vs. BOUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 28.21% | 43.24% | 21.80% | 51.31% | -46.00% | 7.54% | 86.25% | 31.76% | -21.40% |
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 31.39% | -6.77% | 18.82% | 13.27% | -22.60% | 22.69% | 50.56% | 20.59% | -29.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOUP and BOUT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2018 | 0.69 |
The correlation between LOUP and BOUT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
LOUP vs. BOUT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LOUP
BOUT
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
LOUP
BOUT
Industrials
LOUP
BOUT
Communication Services
LOUP
BOUT
Consumer Cyclical
LOUP
BOUT
Financial Services
LOUP
BOUT
Energy
LOUP
BOUT
Utilities
LOUP
BOUT
Healthcare
LOUP
BOUT
Basic Materials
LOUP
-
BOUT
Consumer Defensive
LOUP
-
BOUT
Real Estate
LOUP
-
BOUT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOUP vs. BOUT — Risk / Return Rank
LOUP
BOUT
LOUP vs. BOUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOUP | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.30 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 3.01 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | 9.00 | +3.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOUP | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 1.71 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.43 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.41 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
LOUP vs. BOUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOUP drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than BOUT's maximum drawdown of -36.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOUP and BOUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOUP | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -36.75% | -21.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.00% | -11.76% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.23% | -25.31% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.63% | -28.28% | -27.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | -0.01% | -1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.04% | -12.29% | -7.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.19% | 3.93% | +2.26% |
Volatility
LOUP vs. BOUT - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) at 5.96%. This indicates that LOUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOUP | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.23% | 5.96% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.94% | 16.05% | +5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.51% | 20.79% | +7.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.38% | 19.48% | +12.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.96% | 22.93% | +9.03% |
LOUP vs. BOUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BOUT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOUP vs. BOUT - Dividend Comparison
LOUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 0.26% | 0.34% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOUP and BOUT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOUP has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to BOUT (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOUP dropped -58.68% vs BOUT's -36.75%.
On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 12.98% vs 8.25% for BOUT. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BOUT has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.
BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for LOUP.
LOUP is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOUT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index, while BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LOUP and 0.80% for BOUT.
LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOUP and BOUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer