LOUP vs. BAPR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index, while BAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LOUP returned 10.70%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for BAPR. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LOUP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BAPR.

Performance

LOUP vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LOUP having a 11.39% return and BAPR slightly higher at 11.91%.

LOUP

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: -11.40%
• 6M: 9.89%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 1Y: 37.12%
• 3Y*: 27.47%
• 5Y*: 10.70%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.49%

BAPR

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 0.89%
• 6M: 11.13%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 1Y: 18.11%
• 3Y*: 13.78%
• 5Y*: 10.92%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	$248.94K	$604.46K	$476.54K
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	$926.73K	$920.97K	$1.38M

LOUP vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	11.39%	43.24%	21.80%	51.31%	-46.00%	7.54%	86.25%	11.22%
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	11.91%	8.28%	15.95%	23.16%	-7.04%	12.58%	6.19%	10.36%

Correlation

The correlation between LOUP and BAPR is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2019	0.76

The correlation between LOUP and BAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

LOUP vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LOUP	BAPR
Technology	57.5%	37.9%
Industrials	16.0%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	9.6%
Utilities	3.6%	2.3%
Financial Services	3.6%	11.7%
Energy	3.2%	3.0%
Communication Services	3.0%	10.0%
Healthcare	2.8%	9.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.6%
Real Estate	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

LOUP vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LOUP

LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 42
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 42

BAPR

BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 97
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LOUP vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LOUP	BAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	2.95	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	4.80	-3.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.67	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	9.02	-7.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.59	41.44	-36.85

LOUP vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOUP Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOUP and BAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LOUP vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOUP drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than BAPR's maximum drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOUP and BAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOUP	BAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.68%	-23.91%	-34.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.00%	-1.93%	-19.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.23%	-15.58%	-19.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.63%	-15.58%	-40.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.75%	0.00%	-14.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.79%	-2.55%	-17.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.09%	0.42%	+6.67%

Volatility

LOUP vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 1.71%. This indicates that LOUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOUP	BAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.47%	1.71%	+7.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.04%	5.16%	+19.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.22%	5.93%	+25.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.84%	11.51%	+21.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.07%	13.01%	+19.06%

LOUP vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOUP vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOUP nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOUP and BAPR in my portfolio?

LOUP and BAPR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOUP or BAPR?

LOUP has higher volatility (9.47%) compared to BAPR (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOUP dropped -58.68% vs BAPR's -23.91%.

Which ETF is better, LOUP or BAPR?

On 5-year performance, BAPR leads with 10.92% vs 10.70% for LOUP. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LOUP or BAPR?

Over the 5-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 10.92% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOUP or BAPR?

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOUP or BAPR?

LOUP and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LOUP and BAPR?

LOUP is categorized as Technology Equities, while BAPR is Defined Outcome. LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index, while BAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LOUP and 0.79% for BAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.