LOTI vs. TBFC

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

LOTI (Liberty One Tactical Income ETF) and TBFC (The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOTI charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TBFC.

Performance

LOTI vs. TBFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liberty One Tactical Income ETF (LOTI) and The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LOTI having a 5.19% return and TBFC slightly lower at 5.07%.

LOTI

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 1.18%
• 6M: 5.54%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TBFC

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.04%
• 6M: 3.63%
• YTD: 5.07%
• 1Y: 12.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOTI vs. TBFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LOTI Liberty One Tactical Income ETF	5.19%	1.06%
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF	5.07%	2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LOTI and TBFC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.22

Return for Risk

LOTI vs. TBFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOTI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TBFC

TBFC Risk / Return Rank: 64
TBFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
TBFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
TBFC Omega Ratio Rank: 68
TBFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TBFC Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOTI vs. TBFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty One Tactical Income ETF (LOTI) and The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LOTI	TBFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.73	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.43	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.18	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.92	—

Drawdowns

LOTI vs. TBFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOTI drawdown since its inception was -4.42%, smaller than the maximum TBFC drawdown of -8.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOTI and TBFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOTI	TBFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-8.89%	+4.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.89%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-1.06%	-0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LOTI	TBFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.56%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.91%	6.89%	-0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.91%	7.26%	-1.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.91%	7.26%	-1.35%

LOTI vs. TBFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOTI has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFC's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOTI vs. TBFC - Dividend Comparison

LOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than TBFC's 3.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LOTI Liberty One Tactical Income ETF	1.58%	0.45%	0.00%
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF	3.01%	3.28%	2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOTI and TBFC in my portfolio?

LOTI and TBFC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LOTI or TBFC?

On fees, TBFC is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOTI or TBFC?

TBFC is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for LOTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOTI or TBFC?

TBFC has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.58% for LOTI.

What is the main difference between LOTI and TBFC?

They also come from different issuers: Liberty One and Brinsmere. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for LOTI and 0.44% for TBFC.