LOPP vs. GCAD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LOPP (Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF) and GCAD (Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOPP is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while GCAD is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LOPP returned 14.62%/yr vs 30.96%/yr for GCAD. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.00% expense ratio.

Performance

LOPP vs. GCAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LOPP having a 15.71% return and GCAD slightly lower at 15.30%.

LOPP

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.85%
• 6M: 8.45%
• YTD: 15.71%
• 1Y: 27.00%
• 3Y*: 14.62%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: —

GCAD

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: -4.29%
• 6M: 1.08%
• YTD: 15.30%
• 1Y: 27.53%
• 3Y*: 30.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOPP vs. GCAD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF	15.71%	22.61%	9.89%	4.90%
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF	15.30%	39.28%	26.61%	17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between LOPP and GCAD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2023	0.71

The correlation between LOPP and GCAD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

LOPP vs. GCAD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LOPP	GCAD
Industrials	50.1%	78.1%
Utilities	16.5%	-
Technology	8.5%	1.0%
Basic Materials	6.2%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	6.8%
Energy	3.8%	-
Healthcare	3.4%	-
Real Estate	3.1%	0.6%
Financial Services	2.5%	-
Communication Services	1.4%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

LOPP vs. GCAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOPP

LOPP Risk / Return Rank: 62
LOPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
LOPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LOPP Omega Ratio Rank: 53
LOPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
LOPP Martin Ratio Rank: 69

GCAD

GCAD Risk / Return Rank: 47
GCAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
GCAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GCAD Omega Ratio Rank: 46
GCAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
GCAD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOPP vs. GCAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LOPP	GCAD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.34	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	2.07	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.24	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	1.85	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.97	6.18	+3.79

LOPP vs. GCAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the GCAD Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOPP and GCAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LOPP vs. GCAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOPP drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, which is greater than GCAD's maximum drawdown of -16.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOPP and GCAD.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOPP	GCAD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.28%	-16.14%	-9.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.77%	-14.96%	+5.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.28%	-16.14%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.99%	-6.89%	+2.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.11%	-3.01%	-5.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	4.46%	-1.75%

Volatility

LOPP vs. GCAD - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) have volatilities of 5.10% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOPP	GCAD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.10%	5.00%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.92%	17.20%	-3.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.23%	20.67%	-3.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.18%	18.76%	-0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.74%	18.76%	-1.02%

LOPP vs. GCAD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOPP has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GCAD's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LOPP vs. GCAD - Dividend Comparison

LOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than GCAD's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF	1.79%	2.06%	4.94%	3.62%	0.00%	0.00%
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF	0.72%	0.83%	1.88%	2.23%	2.01%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOPP and GCAD in my portfolio?

LOPP and GCAD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOPP or GCAD?

LOPP has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to GCAD (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOPP dropped -25.28% vs GCAD's -16.14%.

Which ETF is better, LOPP or GCAD?

On 3-year performance, GCAD leads with 30.96% vs 14.62% for LOPP. Both ETFs have the same 0.00% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LOPP or GCAD?

Over the 3-year period, GCAD has performed better with a 30.96% return vs 14.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOPP or GCAD?

LOPP and GCAD have the same expense ratio: 0.00% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOPP or GCAD?

GCAD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.72% for LOPP.

What is the main difference between LOPP and GCAD?

LOPP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GCAD is Aerospace & Defense.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LOPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.