LOPP vs. GABF

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

LOPP (Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOPP is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LOPP returned 14.48%/yr vs 20.10%/yr for GABF. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOPP charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.

Performance

LOPP vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOPP achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -2.34% return.

LOPP

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: 9.67%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 1Y: 26.03%
• 3Y*: 14.48%
• 5Y*: 7.94%
• 10Y*: —

GABF

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: -5.40%
• YTD: -2.34%
• 1Y: -4.10%
• 3Y*: 20.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOPP vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF	14.81%	22.61%	9.89%	4.74%	3.20%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-2.34%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LOPP and GABF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between LOPP and GABF has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LOPP vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LOPP	GABF
Industrials	50.1%	4.9%
Utilities	16.5%	-
Technology	8.5%	5.2%
Basic Materials	6.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	-
Energy	3.8%	-
Healthcare	3.4%	-
Real Estate	3.1%	4.3%
Financial Services	2.5%	85.6%
Communication Services	1.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

LOPP vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOPP

LOPP Risk / Return Rank: 60
LOPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LOPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
LOPP Omega Ratio Rank: 52
LOPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LOPP Martin Ratio Rank: 68

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 7
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOPP vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LOPP	GABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	-0.23	+1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	-0.20	+2.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.98	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	-0.24	+2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.74	-0.53	+10.27

LOPP vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOPP and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LOPP vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOPP drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOPP and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOPP	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.28%	-20.86%	-4.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.77%	-17.16%	+7.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.28%	-20.86%	+0.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.74%	-7.14%	+2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.12%	-4.94%	-3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	7.78%	-5.10%

Volatility

LOPP vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) at 4.51%. This indicates that LOPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOPP	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	4.51%	+1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.94%	13.37%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.25%	17.59%	-0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.18%	20.45%	-2.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.75%	20.45%	-2.70%

LOPP vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOPP has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LOPP vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

LOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than GABF's 2.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.01%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%	0.00%
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF	0.72%	0.83%	1.88%	2.23%	2.01%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOPP and GABF in my portfolio?

LOPP and GABF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOPP or GABF?

LOPP has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to GABF (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOPP dropped -25.28% vs GABF's -20.86%.

Which ETF is better, LOPP or GABF?

On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 20.10% vs 14.48% for LOPP. On fees, LOPP is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LOPP or GABF?

Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 20.10% return vs 14.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOPP or GABF?

LOPP is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GABF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOPP or GABF?

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.72% for LOPP.

What is the main difference between LOPP and GABF?

LOPP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for LOPP and 0.10% for GABF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LOPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.