LOMAX vs. TRLIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

LOMAX (Edgar Lomax Value Fund) and TRLIX (TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LOMAX returned 10.95%/yr vs 11.68%/yr for TRLIX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LOMAX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for TRLIX.

Performance

LOMAX vs. TRLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX) and TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOMAX achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than TRLIX's 18.41% return. Over the past 10 years, LOMAX has underperformed TRLIX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while TRLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.68% annualized return.

LOMAX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 2.86%
• 6M: 10.32%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 1Y: 29.22%
• 3Y*: 16.52%
• 5Y*: 11.25%
• 10Y*: 10.95%
• ALL TIME*: 7.41%

TRLIX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 2.36%
• 6M: 12.47%
• YTD: 18.41%
• 1Y: 31.39%
• 3Y*: 18.36%
• 5Y*: 12.61%
• 10Y*: 11.68%
• ALL TIME*: 10.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LOMAX Edgar Lomax Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TRLIX TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LOMAX vs. TRLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LOMAX Edgar Lomax Value Fund	16.21%	18.09%	10.29%	5.19%	-0.46%	25.80%	-5.77%	23.27%	-3.31%	19.52%
TRLIX TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund	18.41%	17.44%	14.79%	14.35%	-7.03%	27.10%	3.59%	28.83%	-14.29%	10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between LOMAX and TRLIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2002	0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between LOMAX and TRLIX has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LOMAX vs. TRLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LOMAX

LOMAX Risk / Return Rank: 96
LOMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LOMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LOMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LOMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LOMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

TRLIX

TRLIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
TRLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
TRLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
TRLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
TRLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
TRLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LOMAX vs. TRLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX) and TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LOMAX	TRLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.61	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.22	3.64	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.47	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.89	4.06	+1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.27	16.82	+3.46

LOMAX vs. TRLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the TRLIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOMAX and TRLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LOMAX vs. TRLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOMAX drawdown since its inception was -57.82%, smaller than the maximum TRLIX drawdown of -61.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOMAX and TRLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOMAX	TRLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.82%	-61.94%	+4.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.86%	-7.35%	+2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.93%	-14.69%	+2.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.50%	-20.13%	+2.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.81%	-38.54%	+0.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	0.00%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.35%	-8.78%	-0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.41%	1.79%	-0.38%

Volatility

LOMAX vs. TRLIX - Volatility Comparison

Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX) at 3.16%. This indicates that LOMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOMAX	TRLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	3.16%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.49%	8.78%	-1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.10%	11.50%	-1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.23%	14.89%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.50%	17.95%	-1.45%

LOMAX vs. TRLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOMAX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLIX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOMAX vs. TRLIX - Dividend Comparison

LOMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, less than TRLIX's 7.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LOMAX Edgar Lomax Value Fund	5.45%	6.34%	6.27%	4.66%	7.73%	5.11%	12.52%	2.16%	15.97%	8.80%	2.68%	15.54%
TRLIX TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund	7.45%	8.82%	4.01%	8.58%	6.13%	9.19%	1.89%	2.08%	12.82%	5.19%	4.29%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOMAX and TRLIX in my portfolio?

LOMAX and TRLIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOMAX or TRLIX?

LOMAX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to TRLIX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOMAX dropped -57.82% vs TRLIX's -61.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LOMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.