PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOGSX vs. HGHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOGSX vs. HGHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) and The Hartford Healthcare Fund (HGHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOGSX achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than HGHYX's 5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGSX has underperformed HGHYX with an annualized return of 7.42%, while HGHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.02% annualized return.


LOGSX

1D
-1.12%
1M
-0.47%
6M
5.28%
YTD
8.33%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
7.42%
ALL TIME*
7.81%

HGHYX

1D
-0.81%
1M
-3.07%
6M
4.66%
YTD
5.05%
1Y
31.94%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
9.02%
ALL TIME*
10.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LOGSX vs. HGHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOGSX
Live Oak Health Sciences Fund
8.33%19.63%0.16%1.21%3.71%17.59%6.01%18.98%-3.84%13.42%
HGHYX
The Hartford Healthcare Fund
5.05%15.95%0.23%4.04%-11.48%10.24%23.07%41.54%-2.81%22.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LOGSX and HGHYX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2001

0.87

The correlation between LOGSX and HGHYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOGSX vs. HGHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LOGSX
LOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
LOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

HGHYX
HGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LOGSX vs. HGHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) and The Hartford Healthcare Fund (HGHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOGSXHGHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.02

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.26

8.18

+1.08

LOGSX vs. HGHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the HGHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOGSX and HGHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOGSX vs. HGHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOGSX drawdown since its inception was -45.85%, which is greater than HGHYX's maximum drawdown of -42.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGSX and HGHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOGSXHGHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.85%

-42.58%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-10.82%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.33%

-22.60%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.03%

-25.42%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

-28.51%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-3.91%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-7.61%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

3.99%

-0.81%

Volatility

LOGSX vs. HGHYX - Volatility Comparison

Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to The Hartford Healthcare Fund (HGHYX) at 5.23%. This indicates that LOGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOGSXHGHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

5.23%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

11.94%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.88%

15.77%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

16.06%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

17.76%

-1.57%

LOGSX vs. HGHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOGSX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than HGHYX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOGSX vs. HGHYX - Dividend Comparison

LOGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than HGHYX's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HGHYX
The Hartford Healthcare Fund
2.74%2.88%4.74%0.00%0.83%8.86%10.56%10.72%7.15%4.67%9.23%13.39%
LOGSX
Live Oak Health Sciences Fund
1.91%2.07%2.64%6.28%0.55%7.02%7.04%0.85%15.20%6.45%2.10%15.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOGSX and HGHYX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOGSX has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to HGHYX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOGSX dropped -45.85% vs HGHYX's -42.58%.

HGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOGSX and HGHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer