PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOGSX vs. DLHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOGSX vs. DLHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) and Delaware Healthcare Fund (DLHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOGSX achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly higher than DLHIX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGSX has underperformed DLHIX with an annualized return of 7.23%, while DLHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.52% annualized return.


LOGSX

1D
1.43%
1M
0.80%
YTD
2.25%
6M
0.79%
1Y
18.20%
3Y*
9.18%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
7.23%

DLHIX

1D
1.21%
1M
2.06%
YTD
1.17%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
26.82%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
11.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOGSX vs. DLHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOGSX
Live Oak Health Sciences Fund
2.25%19.63%0.16%1.21%3.71%17.59%6.01%18.98%-3.84%13.42%
DLHIX
Delaware Healthcare Fund
1.17%22.27%8.76%5.42%-0.99%5.48%12.02%31.82%-0.59%32.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LOGSX and DLHIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.85

The correlation between LOGSX and DLHIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOGSX vs. DLHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOGSX
LOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
LOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

DLHIX
DLHIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DLHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DLHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOGSX vs. DLHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) and Delaware Healthcare Fund (DLHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOGSXDLHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.81

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

8.12

-2.18

LOGSX vs. DLHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the DLHIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOGSX and DLHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOGSX vs. DLHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOGSX drawdown since its inception was -45.85%, which is greater than DLHIX's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGSX and DLHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOGSXDLHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.85%

-34.64%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-10.30%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.33%

-19.79%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.03%

-19.79%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

-25.60%

-1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-2.52%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-5.55%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.55%

-0.24%

Volatility

LOGSX vs. DLHIX - Volatility Comparison

Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) and Delaware Healthcare Fund (DLHIX) have volatilities of 5.38% and 5.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOGSXDLHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

5.43%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

12.32%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

16.84%

-2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.27%

16.03%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

17.90%

-1.74%

LOGSX vs. DLHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOGSX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than DLHIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOGSX vs. DLHIX - Dividend Comparison

LOGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than DLHIX's 11.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLHIX
Delaware Healthcare Fund
11.03%11.16%14.00%6.97%9.16%5.41%6.19%7.63%2.11%3.23%8.20%7.90%
LOGSX
Live Oak Health Sciences Fund
2.03%2.07%2.64%6.28%0.55%7.02%7.04%0.85%15.20%6.45%2.10%15.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOGSX and DLHIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLHIX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to LOGSX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOGSX dropped -45.85% vs DLHIX's -34.64%.

DLHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOGSX and DLHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer