LOGS.DE vs. XGSD.L
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and XGSD.L (Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while XGSD.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE returned 12.14%/yr vs 9.02%/yr for XGSD.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XGSD.L.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. XGSD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LOGS.DE is traded in EUR, while XGSD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XGSD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 31.31% return, which is significantly higher than XGSD.L's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE has outperformed XGSD.L with an annualized return of 12.14%, while XGSD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.02% annualized return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
XGSD.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 13.80%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 29.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
LOGS.DE vs. XGSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.06% | -21.75% | 4.34% | 5.49% | 2.29% |
XGSD.L Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D | 13.80% | 18.95% | 14.37% | 4.99% | -1.11% | 22.33% | -8.51% | 23.23% | -6.77% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and XGSD.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2007 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LOGS.DE and XGSD.L has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. XGSD.L — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
XGSD.L
LOGS.DE vs. XGSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGS.DE | XGSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.63 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.83 | 7.84 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.29 | 27.79 | +6.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGS.DE | XGSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 3.37 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.91 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.62 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.23 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. XGSD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, smaller than the maximum XGSD.L drawdown of -67.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and XGSD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | XGSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -67.56% | +11.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -3.80% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -13.74% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -13.74% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.42% | -38.13% | -18.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -0.47% | -4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -14.72% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 1.07% | +0.80% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. XGSD.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) at 2.46%. This indicates that LOGS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | XGSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 2.46% | +3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 6.43% | +6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 8.85% | +8.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 12.07% | +9.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 15.03% | +9.06% |
LOGS.DE vs. XGSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XGSD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. XGSD.L - Dividend Comparison
LOGS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XGSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XGSD.L Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D | 4.15% | 4.60% | 6.39% | 7.50% | 8.70% | 4.77% | 5.38% | 4.26% | 4.68% | 3.57% | 2.76% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and XGSD.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XGSD.L.
LOGS.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while XGSD.L is Global Equity Income. LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while XGSD.L tracks STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.50% for XGSD.L.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and XGSD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer