LOGS.DE vs. XDW0.DE
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and XDW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both Energy Equities funds - LOGS.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+ while XDW0.DE tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE returned 12.14%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for XDW0.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDW0.DE.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LOGS.DE having a 31.31% return and XDW0.DE slightly higher at 32.75%. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE has outperformed XDW0.DE with an annualized return of 12.14%, while XDW0.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
XDW0.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 32.75%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 45.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
LOGS.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.06% | -21.75% | 4.34% | 5.49% | 2.29% |
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 32.75% | 2.24% | 7.48% | 0.18% | 53.95% | 52.18% | -36.97% | 14.05% | -12.13% | -7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and XDW0.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LOGS.DE and XDW0.DE has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. XDW0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
XDW0.DE
LOGS.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGS.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.37 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.83 | 2.98 | +6.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.29 | 9.92 | +24.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGS.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 2.10 | +1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.84 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.35 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.37 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.DE drawdown of -61.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and XDW0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -61.44% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -15.05% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -23.71% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -23.71% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.42% | -61.44% | +5.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -7.38% | +2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -13.84% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 4.53% | -2.66% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) is 6.06%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that LOGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 6.96% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 18.42% | -5.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 21.48% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 24.04% | -2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 26.02% | -1.93% |
LOGS.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDW0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGS.DE nor XDW0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and XDW0.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDW0.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDW0.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.25% for XDW0.DE.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and XDW0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer