LOGS.DE vs. QDVF.DE
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds - LOGS.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+ while QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE returned 12.14%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for QDVF.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LOGS.DE having a 31.31% return and QDVF.DE slightly higher at 32.71%. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE has outperformed QDVF.DE with an annualized return of 12.14%, while QDVF.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.97% annualized return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 29.55%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
LOGS.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.06% | -21.75% | 4.34% | 5.49% | 2.29% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 72.13% | 67.92% | -40.24% | 13.02% | -14.92% | -13.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and QDVF.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.72 |
The correlation between LOGS.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
QDVF.DE
LOGS.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGS.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.32 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.83 | 2.54 | +7.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.29 | 7.98 | +26.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGS.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 1.82 | +1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.79 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.31 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.28 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -65.81% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -17.23% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -27.13% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -27.13% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.42% | -65.81% | +9.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -8.92% | +4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -17.41% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 5.49% | -3.62% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) is 6.06%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that LOGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 7.70% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 20.43% | -7.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 24.05% | -6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 26.95% | -5.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 28.68% | -4.59% |
LOGS.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGS.DE nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer