LOGS.DE vs. QCLN.DE
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and QCLN.DE (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - LOGS.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+ while QCLN.DE tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LOGS.DE returned 21.48%/yr vs 2.29%/yr for QCLN.DE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.DE.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 31.31% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN.DE's 49.11% return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
QCLN.DE
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 14.31%
- YTD
- 49.11%
- 6M
- 47.01%
- 1Y
- 111.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- —
LOGS.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 15.96% |
QCLN.DE First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 49.11% | 16.50% | -14.54% | -10.39% | -26.09% | -12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and QCLN.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2021 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. QCLN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
QCLN.DE
LOGS.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGS.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.44 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.83 | 7.93 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.29 | 24.33 | +9.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGS.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 3.20 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.06 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | -0.08 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, smaller than the maximum QCLN.DE drawdown of -69.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and QCLN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -69.59% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -14.04% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -56.68% | +35.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -69.59% | +48.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -20.21% | +15.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -39.08% | +23.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 4.59% | -2.72% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) is 6.06%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE) has a volatility of 14.59%. This indicates that LOGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 14.59% | -8.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 24.80% | -11.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 34.84% | -17.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 36.29% | -14.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 36.76% | -12.67% |
LOGS.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLN.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGS.DE nor QCLN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and QCLN.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLN.DE.
LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while QCLN.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.60% for QCLN.DE.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and QCLN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer