LOGS.DE vs. LEER.DE
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and LEER.DE (Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while LEER.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe ex Russia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE returned 12.14%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for LEER.DE. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for LEER.DE.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. LEER.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 31.31% return, which is significantly higher than LEER.DE's 18.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE has outperformed LEER.DE with an annualized return of 12.14%, while LEER.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.92% annualized return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
LEER.DE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 25.17%
- 1Y
- 42.24%
- 3Y*
- 31.18%
- 5Y*
- 16.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
LOGS.DE vs. LEER.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.06% | -21.75% | 4.34% | 5.49% | 2.29% |
LEER.DE Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF | 18.03% | 53.92% | 4.11% | 41.71% | -21.16% | 20.40% | -18.41% | 1.33% | -8.39% | 30.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and LEER.DE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2007 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LOGS.DE and LEER.DE has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. LEER.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
LEER.DE
LOGS.DE vs. LEER.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGS.DE | LEER.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.34 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.83 | 4.24 | +5.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.29 | 11.61 | +22.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGS.DE | LEER.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 2.00 | +1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.71 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.50 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.12 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. LEER.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, smaller than the maximum LEER.DE drawdown of -72.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and LEER.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | LEER.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -72.16% | +15.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -9.92% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -15.85% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -43.49% | +22.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.42% | -48.74% | -7.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -0.84% | -3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -33.44% | +18.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 3.63% | -1.76% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. LEER.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) have volatilities of 6.06% and 6.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | LEER.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 6.19% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 16.81% | -3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 21.00% | -3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 23.00% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 21.97% | +2.12% |
LOGS.DE vs. LEER.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LEER.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. LEER.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGS.DE nor LEER.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and LEER.DE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for LEER.DE.
LOGS.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while LEER.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while LEER.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe ex Russia Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.50% for LEER.DE.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and LEER.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer