LOGS.DE vs. IPRP.L
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and IPRP.L (iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while IPRP.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE returned 12.53%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for IPRP.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IPRP.L.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. IPRP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LOGS.DE is traded in EUR, while IPRP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IPRP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 30.23% return, which is significantly higher than IPRP.L's 1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE has outperformed IPRP.L with an annualized return of 12.53%, while IPRP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.02% annualized return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 30.23%
- 6M
- 32.47%
- 1Y
- 58.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 21.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
IPRP.L
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- 1Y
- -0.16%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- -4.38%
- 10Y*
- 1.02%
LOGS.DE vs. IPRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 30.23% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.07% | -21.75% | 11.25% | -0.78% | 1.96% |
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 1.56% | 7.71% | -0.38% | 17.86% | -37.16% | 8.51% | -9.06% | 25.99% | -6.53% | 14.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and IPRP.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.31 |
The correlation between LOGS.DE and IPRP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. IPRP.L — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
IPRP.L
LOGS.DE vs. IPRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOGS.DE | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.01 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.57 | -0.01 | +8.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.33 | -0.03 | +28.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. IPRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.41%, smaller than the maximum IPRP.L drawdown of -70.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and IPRP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.41% | -70.83% | +14.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.78% | -15.29% | +8.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -16.33% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -49.41% | +28.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.41% | -50.12% | -6.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.47% | -25.78% | +20.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -17.83% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 6.04% | -3.99% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. IPRP.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) at 4.19%. This indicates that LOGS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 4.19% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 12.73% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.44% | 15.03% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 21.39% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 19.34% | +4.72% |
LOGS.DE vs. IPRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IPRP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. IPRP.L - Dividend Comparison
LOGS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.50% | 2.83% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 4.20% | 2.11% | 2.68% | 3.07% | 3.24% | 2.81% | 2.49% | 2.59% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and IPRP.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IPRP.L.
LOGS.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while IPRP.L is REIT. LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.40% for IPRP.L.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and IPRP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer