LOGS.DE vs. G1CE.DE
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and G1CE.DE (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - LOGS.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+ while G1CE.DE tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LOGS.DE returned 21.48%/yr vs -3.72%/yr for G1CE.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for G1CE.DE.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 31.31% return, which is significantly lower than G1CE.DE's 36.05% return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
G1CE.DE
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 36.05%
- 6M
- 37.56%
- 1Y
- 83.69%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- -3.72%
- 10Y*
- —
LOGS.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 9.23% |
G1CE.DE Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 36.05% | 27.39% | -22.23% | -13.46% | -25.42% | -5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and G1CE.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2021 | 0.44 |
The correlation between LOGS.DE and G1CE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. G1CE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
G1CE.DE
LOGS.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (G1CE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGS.DE | G1CE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.61 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.83 | 7.99 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.29 | 28.31 | +5.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGS.DE | G1CE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 3.88 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | -0.14 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | -0.13 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, smaller than the maximum G1CE.DE drawdown of -68.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and G1CE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | G1CE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -68.84% | +12.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -10.42% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -52.75% | +31.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -68.84% | +47.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -27.70% | +23.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -38.48% | +23.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 2.95% | -1.08% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) is 6.06%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (G1CE.DE) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that LOGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G1CE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | G1CE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 8.41% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 14.61% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 21.47% | -4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 26.14% | -4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 26.36% | -2.27% |
LOGS.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than G1CE.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGS.DE nor G1CE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and G1CE.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for G1CE.DE.
LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while G1CE.DE tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.60% for G1CE.DE.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and G1CE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer