LOGS.DE vs. ESIE.DE
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and ESIE.DE (iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds - LOGS.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+ while ESIE.DE tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LOGS.DE returned 21.48%/yr vs 19.66%/yr for ESIE.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIE.DE.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 31.31% return, which is significantly lower than ESIE.DE's 35.70% return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
ESIE.DE
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 35.70%
- 6M
- 31.40%
- 1Y
- 55.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- —
LOGS.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.06% | 7.22% |
ESIE.DE iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 35.70% | 15.26% | -6.63% | 8.58% | 35.56% | 35.47% | 6.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and ESIE.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between LOGS.DE and ESIE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. ESIE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
ESIE.DE
LOGS.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGS.DE | ESIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.41 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.83 | 4.45 | +5.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.29 | 14.31 | +19.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGS.DE | ESIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 2.40 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.82 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.93 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, which is greater than ESIE.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and ESIE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | ESIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -26.20% | -30.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -12.33% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -26.20% | +5.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -26.20% | +5.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -6.72% | +2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -6.68% | -8.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 3.84% | -1.97% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) is 6.06%, while iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.DE) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that LOGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | ESIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 7.06% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 19.84% | -6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 22.89% | -5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 23.75% | -2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 24.16% | -0.07% |
LOGS.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIE.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGS.DE nor ESIE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and ESIE.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while ESIE.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.18% for ESIE.DE.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and ESIE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer