LOGS.DE vs. D5BK.DE
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and D5BK.DE (Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while D5BK.DE is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE returned 12.53%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for D5BK.DE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for D5BK.DE.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. D5BK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 30.23% return, which is significantly higher than D5BK.DE's 1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE has outperformed D5BK.DE with an annualized return of 12.53%, while D5BK.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.42% annualized return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 30.23%
- 6M
- 32.47%
- 1Y
- 58.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 21.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
D5BK.DE
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- 1Y
- -0.90%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- -4.66%
- 10Y*
- 0.42%
LOGS.DE vs. D5BK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 30.23% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.07% | -21.75% | 11.25% | -0.78% | 1.96% |
D5BK.DE Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C | 1.25% | 5.96% | -4.03% | 15.92% | -36.47% | 16.81% | -10.27% | 29.66% | -8.93% | 12.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and D5BK.DE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2010 | 0.39 |
The correlation between LOGS.DE and D5BK.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. D5BK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
D5BK.DE
LOGS.DE vs. D5BK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (D5BK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOGS.DE | D5BK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.00 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.57 | -0.06 | +8.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.33 | -0.14 | +28.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. D5BK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.41%, which is greater than D5BK.DE's maximum drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and D5BK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | D5BK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.41% | -46.42% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.78% | -15.59% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -21.63% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -46.42% | +25.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.41% | -46.42% | -9.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.47% | -26.88% | +21.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -13.25% | -5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 6.27% | -4.22% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. D5BK.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (D5BK.DE) at 5.11%. This indicates that LOGS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than D5BK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | D5BK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 5.11% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 13.34% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.44% | 15.97% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 21.54% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 19.94% | +4.12% |
LOGS.DE vs. D5BK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than D5BK.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. D5BK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGS.DE nor D5BK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and D5BK.DE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for D5BK.DE.
LOGS.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while D5BK.DE is REIT. LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while D5BK.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.33% for D5BK.DE.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and D5BK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer