PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOGOX vs. DGIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOGOX vs. DGIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf Multi-Asset Opportunity Fund (LOGOX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOGOX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than DGIFX's 14.46% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGOX has underperformed DGIFX with an annualized return of 7.63%, while DGIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.


LOGOX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.59%
6M
-0.89%
YTD
1.77%
1Y
9.32%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
7.63%
ALL TIME*
8.18%

DGIFX

1D
1.54%
1M
-0.22%
6M
9.96%
YTD
14.46%
1Y
16.75%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
11.75%
ALL TIME*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LOGOX vs. DGIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOGOX
Scharf Multi-Asset Opportunity Fund
1.77%12.37%7.49%13.40%-9.25%15.52%11.67%20.95%-2.65%10.36%
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
14.46%3.54%21.13%33.10%-18.35%9.59%24.07%23.97%-2.39%14.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LOGOX and DGIFX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between LOGOX and DGIFX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOGOX vs. DGIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LOGOX
LOGOX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LOGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LOGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

DGIFX
DGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
DGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LOGOX vs. DGIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf Multi-Asset Opportunity Fund (LOGOX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOGOXDGIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.32

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.15

3.86

-1.71

LOGOX vs. DGIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOGOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the DGIFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOGOX and DGIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOGOX vs. DGIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOGOX drawdown since its inception was -22.16%, smaller than the maximum DGIFX drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGOX and DGIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOGOXDGIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.16%

-30.93%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-10.91%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.54%

-30.93%

+21.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.84%

-30.93%

+14.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.16%

-30.93%

+8.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.25%

-2.55%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-5.87%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

3.72%

+0.07%

Volatility

LOGOX vs. DGIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Scharf Multi-Asset Opportunity Fund (LOGOX) is 2.14%, while Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that LOGOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOGOXDGIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

3.66%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

12.07%

-3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.10%

16.23%

-6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.79%

21.22%

-11.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.26%

18.70%

-8.44%

LOGOX vs. DGIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOGOX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than DGIFX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOGOX vs. DGIFX - Dividend Comparison

LOGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than DGIFX's 7.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
7.22%8.29%20.95%2.78%2.21%11.12%10.09%3.53%3.74%4.29%0.00%0.00%
LOGOX
Scharf Multi-Asset Opportunity Fund
2.02%2.05%5.22%8.67%3.45%9.33%3.76%7.50%7.21%2.18%1.41%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOGOX and DGIFX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGIFX has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to LOGOX (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOGOX dropped -22.16% vs DGIFX's -30.93%.

DGIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOGOX and DGIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer