LOGO vs. CTEF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LOGO (Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LOGO returned -1.07% vs 77.76% for CTEF. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOGO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.

Performance

LOGO vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOGO achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 36.84% return.

LOGO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.87%
• YTD: -4.41%
• 6M: -5.79%
• 1Y: -1.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CTEF

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 13.46%
• YTD: 36.84%
• 6M: 33.43%
• 1Y: 77.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOGO vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF	-4.41%	5.21%
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	36.84%	33.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LOGO and CTEF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.66

The correlation between LOGO and CTEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LOGO vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOGO

LOGO Risk / Return Rank: 8
LOGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
LOGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
LOGO Omega Ratio Rank: 8
LOGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
LOGO Martin Ratio Rank: 8

CTEF

CTEF Risk / Return Rank: 94
CTEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CTEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CTEF Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CTEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CTEF Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOGO vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LOGO	CTEF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.07	3.46	-3.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	4.35	-4.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.56	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	5.21	-5.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.14	24.08	-24.22

LOGO vs. CTEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOGO Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the CTEF Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOGO and CTEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LOGO vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOGO drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGO and CTEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOGO	CTEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.34%	-15.00%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.34%	-15.00%	-3.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.90%	-2.51%	-8.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.89%	-1.75%	-4.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.64%	3.24%	+4.40%

Volatility

LOGO vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) have volatilities of 8.75% and 9.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOGO	CTEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.75%	9.15%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.28%	18.93%	-5.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.04%	22.63%	-6.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.75%	22.51%	-6.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.75%	22.51%	-6.76%

LOGO vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOGO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOGO vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison

LOGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	0.06%	0.08%
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOGO and CTEF in my portfolio?

LOGO and CTEF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOGO or CTEF?

CTEF has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to LOGO (8.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOGO dropped -18.34% vs CTEF's -15.00%.

Which ETF is better, LOGO or CTEF?

On 1-year performance, CTEF leads with 77.76% vs -1.07% for LOGO. On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, LOGO has been the lower-risk option at 8.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LOGO or CTEF?

Over the 1-year period, CTEF has performed better with a 77.76% return vs -1.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOGO or CTEF?

CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for LOGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOGO or CTEF?

CTEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for LOGO.

What is the main difference between LOGO and CTEF?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Brands and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for LOGO and 0.45% for CTEF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.