PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOFF vs. DLLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOFF vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF (LOFF) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LOFF

1D
-5.94%
1M
-47.69%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

DLLL

1D
-1.21%
1M
-3.98%
6M
919.96%
YTD
751.92%
1Y
630.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
331.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$31.49M$38.66M$49.55M
$12.23M$19.42M$33.43M

LOFF vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LOFF and DLLL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2026

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOFF vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOFF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DLLL
DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOFF vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF (LOFF) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOFFDLLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.95

LOFF vs. DLLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOFF vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOFF drawdown since its inception was -70.97%, roughly equal to the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOFF and DLLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOFFDLLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.97%

-68.58%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.97%

-19.41%

-51.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.12%

-25.70%

-20.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.94%

Volatility

LOFF vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOFFDLLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

110.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

169.72%

137.72%

+32.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

169.72%

131.48%

+38.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

169.72%

131.48%

+38.24%

LOFF vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOFF has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOFF vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison

LOFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


LOFF and DLLL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LOFF is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LOFF is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

LOFF has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LOFF and 1.50% for DLLL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOFF and DLLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer