LODI vs. TRFM

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

LODI (AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF) and TRFM (AAM Transformers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LODI is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by AAM, while TRFM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pence Transformers Index - Benchmark TR Gross. LODI is actively managed, while TRFM is passively managed. Over the past year, LODI returned 5.45% vs 45.01% for TRFM. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LODI charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for TRFM.

Performance

LODI vs. TRFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) and AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LODI achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than TRFM's 27.87% return.

LODI

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 2.12%
• 6M: 2.24%
• 1Y: 5.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRFM

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 27.87%
• 6M: 25.92%
• 1Y: 45.01%
• 3Y*: 30.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LODI vs. TRFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LODI AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF	2.12%	6.04%	0.40%
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF	27.87%	25.76%	-4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between LODI and TRFM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.08

Return for Risk

LODI vs. TRFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LODI

LODI Risk / Return Rank: 90
LODI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LODI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LODI Omega Ratio Rank: 94
LODI Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
LODI Martin Ratio Rank: 92

TRFM

TRFM Risk / Return Rank: 65
TRFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
TRFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
TRFM Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TRFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TRFM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LODI vs. TRFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) and AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LODI	TRFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.86	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	2.40	+1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.31	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.32	3.48	+3.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.02	11.25	+7.77

LODI vs. TRFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LODI Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the TRFM Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LODI and TRFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LODI vs. TRFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LODI drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum TRFM drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LODI and TRFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LODI	TRFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.01%	-28.40%	+27.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.75%	-12.99%	+12.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.07%	+3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.20%	-6.58%	+6.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.29%	4.01%	-3.72%

Volatility

LODI vs. TRFM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) is 0.46%, while AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that LODI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LODI	TRFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.46%	11.01%	-10.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.15%	19.61%	-18.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33%	24.30%	-21.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.32%	27.25%	-24.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.32%	27.25%	-24.93%

LODI vs. TRFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

LODI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TRFM's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

LODI vs. TRFM - Dividend Comparison

LODI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than TRFM's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LODI AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF	4.95%	5.11%	0.38%
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF	0.13%	0.17%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LODI and TRFM in my portfolio?

LODI and TRFM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LODI or TRFM?

TRFM has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to LODI (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LODI dropped -1.01% vs TRFM's -28.40%.

Which ETF is better, LODI or TRFM?

On 1-year performance, TRFM leads with 45.01% vs 5.45% for LODI. On fees, LODI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, LODI has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LODI or TRFM?

Over the 1-year period, TRFM has performed better with a 45.01% return vs 5.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LODI or TRFM?

LODI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for TRFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LODI or TRFM?

LODI has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 0.13% for TRFM.

What is the main difference between LODI and TRFM?

LODI is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while TRFM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LODI and 0.49% for TRFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LODI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.