PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LODI vs. CLOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LODI vs. CLOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) and AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LODI achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than CLOC's 2.32% return.


LODI

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.30%
1Y
5.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLOC

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.56%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LODI vs. CLOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LODI
AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF
1.87%0.94%
CLOC
AAM Crescent CLO ETF
2.32%0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LODI and CLOC is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LODI vs. CLOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LODI
LODI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LODI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LODI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LODI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LODI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LODI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LODI vs. CLOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) and AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LODICLOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.31

LODI vs. CLOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LODICLOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.37

6.02

-3.66

Drawdowns

LODI vs. CLOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LODI drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, which is greater than CLOC's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LODI and CLOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LODICLOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-0.54%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.02%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.07%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

Volatility

LODI vs. CLOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LODICLOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40%

0.91%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.34%

0.91%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.34%

0.91%

+1.43%

LODI vs. CLOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LODI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

LODI vs. CLOC - Dividend Comparison

LODI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than CLOC's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CLOC
AAM Crescent CLO ETF
3.67%1.15%0.00%
LODI
AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF
4.96%5.11%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


LODI and CLOC have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LODI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LODI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CLOC.

LODI has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 3.67% for CLOC.

LODI is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CLOC is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LODI and 0.49% for CLOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LODI and CLOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer