PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOCT vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOCT vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOCT achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 6.71% return.


LOCT

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.33%
YTD
2.48%
6M
2.45%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLRI

1D
1.31%
1M
1.23%
YTD
6.71%
6M
7.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOCT vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LOCT and XLRI is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOCT vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOCT
LOCT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOCT vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOCTXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.63

LOCT vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOCT vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOCT drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum XLRI drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCT and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOCTXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-7.12%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.54%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.14%

-1.65%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

Volatility

LOCT vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOCTXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16%

10.99%

-8.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.56%

10.99%

-7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.56%

10.99%

-7.43%

LOCT vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOCT vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

LOCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than XLRI's 12.24% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


LOCT and XLRI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LOCT.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.24%, compared with 5.13% for LOCT.

LOCT is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LOCT and 0.35% for XLRI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOCT and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer