PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOCT vs. APRQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOCT vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LOCT

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.54%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.92%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOCT vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOCT vs. APRQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOCT
LOCT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

APRQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOCT vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOCTAPRQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.14

LOCT vs. APRQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOCTAPRQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.69

Drawdowns

LOCT vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOCT drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCT and APRQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOCTAPRQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

0.00%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

0.00%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

Volatility

LOCT vs. APRQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOCTAPRQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16%

0.00%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.60%

0.00%

+3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.60%

0.00%

+3.60%

LOCT vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LOCT and APRQ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

LOCT vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison

LOCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, while APRQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
APRQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LOCT
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October
5.14%5.12%6.27%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LOCT and APRQ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

LOCT has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 0.00% for APRQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOCT and APRQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer