LOCK.L vs. HTWD.L
LOCK.L (iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc) and HTWD.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - LOCK.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while HTWD.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LOCK.L returned 9.23%/yr vs 20.34%/yr for HTWD.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOCK.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWD.L.
Performance
LOCK.L vs. HTWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOCK.L achieves a 17.34% return, which is significantly lower than HTWD.L's 58.14% return.
LOCK.L
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 16.54%
- YTD
- 17.34%
- 1Y
- 25.50%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- —
HTWD.L
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- 6M
- 47.79%
- YTD
- 58.14%
- 1Y
- 84.21%
- 3Y*
- 40.29%
- 5Y*
- 20.34%
- 10Y*
- 20.67%
LOCK.L vs. HTWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOCK.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc | 17.34% | 11.29% | 16.92% | 33.93% | -29.10% | 16.48% | 26.98% | 28.45% | -12.65% |
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 58.14% | 32.26% | 25.40% | 28.98% | -29.41% | 27.78% | 36.62% | 33.56% | -11.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOCK.L and HTWD.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between LOCK.L and HTWD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOCK.L vs. HTWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
LOCK.L
HTWD.L
LOCK.L vs. HTWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HTWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOCK.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.49 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 7.46 | -5.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.67 | 20.21 | -15.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOCK.L vs. HTWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOCK.L drawdown since its inception was -36.04%, smaller than the maximum HTWD.L drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCK.L and HTWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOCK.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.04% | -41.06% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -11.22% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | -28.22% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.04% | -41.06% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.64% | -10.09% | +5.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -9.65% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.45% | 4.15% | +1.30% |
Volatility
LOCK.L vs. HTWD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) is 7.38%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HTWD.L) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that LOCK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOCK.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 10.95% | -3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.44% | 23.72% | -5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.05% | 27.29% | -5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 23.58% | -2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 21.64% | -0.44% |
LOCK.L vs. HTWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOCK.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HTWD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOCK.L vs. HTWD.L - Dividend Comparison
LOCK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.18% | 2.73% | 3.31% | 1.13% | 1.69% | 2.08% | 2.79% | 1.37% | 2.64% | 2.65% |
LOCK.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOCK.L and HTWD.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOCK.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOCK.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HTWD.L.
LOCK.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while HTWD.L is Emerging Markets Equities. LOCK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while HTWD.L tracks MSCI Taiwan Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LOCK.L and 0.50% for HTWD.L.
Find the right allocation for LOCK.L and HTWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer