PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOCK.L vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOCK.L achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -2.95% return.


LOCK.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
-5.76%
YTD
9.56%
6M
8.70%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*

BRK-B

1D
-1.41%
1M
0.87%
YTD
-2.95%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
0.33%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LOCK.L
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc
9.56%11.29%16.92%33.93%-29.10%16.48%26.98%28.45%-12.65%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-2.95%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%-4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LOCK.L and BRK-B is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018

0.26

The correlation between LOCK.L and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOCK.L
LOCK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
LOCK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOCK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOCK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LOCK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOCK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOCK.LBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.02

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

0.04

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

0.07

+2.58

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOCK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOCK.L and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOCK.L drawdown since its inception was -36.04%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCK.L and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOCK.LBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.04%

-53.86%

+17.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-9.42%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-14.95%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.04%

-26.58%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.97%

-9.63%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-11.07%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

4.51%

+0.86%

Volatility

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) has a higher volatility of 8.98% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.80%. This indicates that LOCK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOCK.LBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.98%

3.80%

+5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.53%

10.53%

+7.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

14.40%

+6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

17.10%

+4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

19.39%

+1.76%

Dividends

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOCK.L nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LOCK.L and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOCK.L and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer