PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOCK.L vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOCK.L achieves a 19.50% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -4.78% return.


LOCK.L

1D
-1.95%
1M
10.02%
YTD
19.50%
6M
21.22%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
21.93%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*

BRK-B

1D
0.69%
1M
2.82%
YTD
-4.78%
6M
-4.89%
1Y
-2.52%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
12.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LOCK.L
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc
19.50%11.36%16.83%33.97%-29.10%16.48%26.98%28.45%-12.58%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-4.78%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%-4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LOCK.L and BRK-B is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.26

The correlation between LOCK.L and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOCK.L
LOCK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LOCK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOCK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOCK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LOCK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOCK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOCK.LBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.98

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

-0.27

+2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.16

-0.57

+5.73

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOCK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOCK.L and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOCK.LBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

-0.18

+1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.61

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.48

+0.10

Drawdowns

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOCK.L drawdown since its inception was -36.04%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCK.L and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOCK.LBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.04%

-53.86%

+17.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-9.42%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.32%

-14.95%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.04%

-26.58%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-11.33%

+8.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.60%

-11.07%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

4.46%

+0.42%

Volatility

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.72%. This indicates that LOCK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOCK.LBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

3.72%

+4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.43%

10.70%

+5.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.55%

14.32%

+6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

17.11%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.13%

19.43%

+1.70%

Dividends

LOCK.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOCK.L nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LOCK.L and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOCK.L and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer