LNVGY vs. MU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lenovo Group Limited (LNVGY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU).

Performance

LNVGY vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lenovo Group Limited (LNVGY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LNVGY vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LNVGY Lenovo Group Limited	1.01%	-4.37%	-4.30%	80.46%	-25.77%	28.05%	47.80%	4.62%	26.37%	3.11%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	18.42%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	24.21%	39.79%	69.49%	-22.84%	87.59%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LNVGY : $17.81B MU : $385.14B
EPS LNVGY : $2.04 MU : $21.30
PE Ratio LNVGY : 11.75 MU : 15.86
PEG Ratio LNVGY : 0.96 MU : 0.06
PS Ratio LNVGY : 0.22 MU : 6.58
PB Ratio LNVGY : 2.52 MU : 5.32
Total Revenue (TTM) LNVGY : $78.43B MU : $58.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) LNVGY : $11.74B MU : $33.96B
EBITDA (TTM) LNVGY : $3.71B MU : $25.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNVGY achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 18.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LNVGY has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 10.79%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 41.16% annualized return.

LNVGY

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -3.43%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: -19.00%
• 1Y: -7.81%
• 3Y*: 7.97%
• 5Y*: 1.40%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

MU

• 1D: 4.98%
• 1M: -18.04%
• YTD: 18.42%
• 6M: 102.21%
• 1Y: 289.74%
• 3Y*: 78.45%
• 5Y*: 30.25%
• 10Y*: 41.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LNVGY vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNVGY

LNVGY Risk / Return Rank: 32
LNVGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
LNVGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LNVGY Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LNVGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
LNVGY Martin Ratio Rank: 33

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNVGY vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lenovo Group Limited (LNVGY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LNVGY	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	4.49	-4.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	3.83	-3.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.52	-0.52
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	9.36	-9.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.56	31.94	-32.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LNVGY vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNVGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 4.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNVGY and MU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LNVGY	MU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	4.49	-4.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.61	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.85	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.25	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between LNVGY and MU is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LNVGY vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

LNVGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than MU's 0.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LNVGY Lenovo Group Limited	4.17%	4.21%	3.83%	3.47%	5.98%	3.58%	3.77%	5.21%	4.74%	10.40%	10.61%	3.21%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.15%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LNVGY vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNVGY drawdown since its inception was -84.37%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNVGY and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNVGY	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.37%	-98.25%	+13.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.98%	-30.28%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.02%	-57.63%	+2.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.02%	-57.63%	+2.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.23%	-26.80%	-1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.65%	-58.46%	+22.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.04%	8.87%	+8.17%

Volatility

LNVGY vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lenovo Group Limited (LNVGY) is 8.45%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 23.12%. This indicates that LNVGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LNVGY	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	23.12%	-14.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.94%	49.17%	-28.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.94%	65.00%	-27.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.61%	49.86%	-6.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.03%	48.59%	-9.56%

Financials

LNVGY vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lenovo Group Limited and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LNVGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lenovo Group Limited reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 22.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.4%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

LNVGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lenovo Group Limited reported an operating income of 922.16M and revenue of 22.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

LNVGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lenovo Group Limited reported a net income of 545.06M and revenue of 22.18B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.