LNVGY vs. CHAT

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

LNVGY (Lenovo Group Limited) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, LNVGY returned 45.90%/yr vs 44.91%/yr for CHAT. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LNVGY vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lenovo Group Limited (LNVGY) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNVGY achieves a 152.47% return, which is significantly higher than CHAT's 49.97% return.

LNVGY

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -4.17%
• 6M: 160.38%
• YTD: 152.47%
• 1Y: 141.91%
• 3Y*: 45.90%
• 5Y*: 29.02%
• 10Y*: 23.61%

CHAT

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -10.28%
• 6M: 44.90%
• YTD: 49.97%
• 1Y: 84.06%
• 3Y*: 44.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNVGY vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LNVGY Lenovo Group Limited	152.47%	-4.37%	-4.30%	49.68%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	49.97%	49.85%	30.98%	21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LNVGY and CHAT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.38

The correlation between LNVGY and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LNVGY vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNVGY

LNVGY Risk / Return Rank: 94
LNVGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LNVGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
LNVGY Omega Ratio Rank: 94
LNVGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LNVGY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 83
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNVGY vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lenovo Group Limited (LNVGY) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LNVGY	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.30	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	2.66	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.36	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.90	5.19	-0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.93	12.87	-3.94

LNVGY vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNVGY Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNVGY and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LNVGY vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNVGY drawdown since its inception was -84.37%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNVGY and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNVGY	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.37%	-31.34%	-53.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.12%	-16.28%	-12.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.60%	-31.34%	-13.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.86%	-15.04%	+4.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.26%	-5.50%	-29.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.95%	6.55%	+9.40%

Volatility

LNVGY vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

Lenovo Group Limited (LNVGY) has a higher volatility of 23.91% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 17.32%. This indicates that LNVGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LNVGY	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.91%	17.32%	+6.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.36%	31.90%	+14.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.83%	36.72%	+17.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.58%	31.70%	+15.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.32%	31.70%	+9.62%

Dividends

LNVGY vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

LNVGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than CHAT's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.90%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LNVGY Lenovo Group Limited	1.67%	4.21%	3.83%	3.47%	5.98%	3.58%	3.77%	5.21%	4.74%	10.40%	10.61%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LNVGY and CHAT in my portfolio?

LNVGY and CHAT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LNVGY or CHAT?

LNVGY has higher volatility (23.91%) compared to CHAT (17.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNVGY dropped -84.37% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LNVGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.