LNGZX vs. CAF
LNGZX (Columbia Greater China Fund) and CAF (Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LNGZX returned 2.95%/yr vs 4.96%/yr for CAF. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LNGZX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for CAF.
Performance
LNGZX vs. CAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNGZX achieves a -10.99% return, which is significantly lower than CAF's 10.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LNGZX has underperformed CAF with an annualized return of 2.95%, while CAF has yielded a comparatively higher 4.96% annualized return.
LNGZX
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- 6M
- -14.42%
- YTD
- -10.99%
- 1Y
- -2.31%
- 3Y*
- 1.74%
- 5Y*
- -8.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.28%
CAF
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 39.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $556.35K | $451.08K | $622.83K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LNGZX vs. CAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNGZX Columbia Greater China Fund | -10.99% | 27.49% | 12.29% | -18.70% | -28.42% | -25.21% | 46.04% | 32.95% | -20.01% | 59.90% |
CAF Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund | 10.31% | 41.51% | 0.34% | -9.39% | -30.41% | -1.77% | 12.74% | 23.50% | -14.26% | 44.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNGZX and CAF is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2006 | 0.65 |
The correlation between LNGZX and CAF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNGZX vs. CAF — Risk / Return Rank
LNGZX
CAF
LNGZX vs. CAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Greater China Fund (LNGZX) and Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund (CAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNGZX | CAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.32 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 3.44 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 9.49 | -9.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNGZX vs. CAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNGZX drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, which is greater than CAF's maximum drawdown of -65.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGZX and CAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNGZX | CAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.37% | -65.88% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.54% | -10.98% | -12.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.58% | -26.27% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.81% | -45.26% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.94% | -49.01% | -18.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.57% | -10.22% | -43.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.67% | -25.75% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.71% | 3.97% | +7.74% |
Volatility
LNGZX vs. CAF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Greater China Fund (LNGZX) is 6.62%, while Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund (CAF) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that LNGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNGZX | CAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 8.51% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.18% | 15.29% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.84% | 20.82% | +1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 21.69% | +7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.61% | 21.96% | +4.65% |
LNGZX vs. CAF - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNGZX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CAF's 1.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
LNGZX vs. CAF - Dividend Comparison
LNGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than CAF's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAF Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund | 1.37% | 1.51% | 2.63% | 0.96% | 0.02% | 6.57% | 10.40% | 3.78% | 9.48% | 5.20% | 4.69% | 67.03% |
LNGZX Columbia Greater China Fund | 2.11% | 1.88% | 1.21% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.29% | 1.40% | 5.85% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 4.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LNGZX and CAF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAF has higher volatility (8.51%) compared to LNGZX (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNGZX dropped -73.37% vs CAF's -65.88%.
CAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNGZX and CAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer