PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMVYX vs. LUBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMVYX vs. LUBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) and Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMVYX achieves a 12.97% return, which is significantly higher than LUBYX's 1.44% return.


LMVYX

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
12.97%
6M
12.73%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
11.62%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
9.17%

LUBYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.81%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMVYX vs. LUBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMVYX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund
12.97%0.23%10.43%13.83%-15.05%27.60%8.57%20.63%-9.57%7.73%
LUBYX
Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund
1.44%4.99%5.70%5.16%-0.38%0.07%1.27%3.00%2.09%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between LMVYX and LUBYX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2016

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMVYX vs. LUBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMVYX
LMVYX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
LMVYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMVYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMVYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LMVYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMVYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

LUBYX
LUBYX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LUBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LUBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMVYX vs. LUBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) and Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMVYXLUBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

3.61

-2.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

11.37

-9.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.67

53.56

-46.88

LMVYX vs. LUBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMVYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the LUBYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMVYX and LUBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMVYXLUBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

3.28

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

2.46

-2.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

2.22

-1.70

Drawdowns

LMVYX vs. LUBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMVYX drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than LUBYX's maximum drawdown of -2.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMVYX and LUBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMVYXLUBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-2.59%

-57.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-0.40%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.97%

-0.50%

-28.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.97%

-1.86%

-27.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

0.00%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-0.17%

-8.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

0.08%

+3.83%

Volatility

LMVYX vs. LUBYX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) at 0.40%. This indicates that LMVYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMVYXLUBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

0.40%

+4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

0.95%

+11.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

1.38%

+16.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.13%

1.37%

+20.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.32%

1.12%

+24.20%

LMVYX vs. LUBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMVYX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than LUBYX's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMVYX vs. LUBYX - Dividend Comparison

LMVYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than LUBYX's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMVYX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund
4.00%4.52%6.69%0.24%4.01%10.49%0.92%16.57%17.51%19.53%17.52%2.40%
LUBYX
Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund
4.41%4.66%4.72%3.69%1.33%0.57%1.16%2.55%2.27%0.52%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMVYX and LUBYX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMVYX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to LUBYX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMVYX dropped -59.70% vs LUBYX's -2.59%.

LUBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMVYX and LUBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer