PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LMVF.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

LMVF.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE).

LMVF.DE and 6AQQ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LMVF.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU. It was launched on Dec 7, 2017. 6AQQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both LMVF.DE and 6AQQ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LMVF.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LMVF.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMVF.DE
Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist		0.32%24.80%9.34%18.84%-11.91%22.15%-0.72%27.42%-13.08%-1.52%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR		-4.21%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%42.90%3.22%-0.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMVF.DE achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than 6AQQ.DE's -4.21% return.

LMVF.DE

1D
2.84%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
0.32%
6M
4.65%
1Y
14.70%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
—

6AQQ.DE

1D
2.55%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-4.21%
6M
-1.21%
1Y
16.23%
3Y*
20.53%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
18.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist

Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR

Often compared with LMVF.DE:
LMVF.DE vs. ISX5.LLMVF.DE vs. EUE.LLMVF.DE vs. PRAZ.DELMVF.DE vs. AMES.DELMVF.DE vs. B41J.DELMVF.DE vs. EXSH.DELMVF.DE vs. LYMS.DE
Often compared with 6AQQ.DE:
6AQQ.DE vs. QQQ6AQQ.DE vs. VUAA.DE6AQQ.DE vs. CNDX.L6AQQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE6AQQ.DE vs. SPY6AQQ.DE vs. QQQ3.L6AQQ.DE vs. XLK

LMVF.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMVF.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
LMVF.DE
Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

LMVF.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LMVF.DE
LMVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
LMVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMVF.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LMVF.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

0.79

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.60

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.27

4.68

+0.60

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LMVF.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMVF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMVF.DE and 6AQQ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LMVF.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.79

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.67

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.95

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.00

-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between LMVF.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LMVF.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

LMVF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, while 6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMVF.DE
Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist		3.24%3.25%2.84%2.59%3.36%2.11%1.99%3.12%3.68%0.35%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LMVF.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMVF.DE and 6AQQ.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

LMVF.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.51%

-31.19%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.06%

-13.37%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-31.19%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-31.19%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-7.58%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-5.40%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

3.42%

-0.58%

Volatility

LMVF.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) at 5.00%. This indicates that LMVF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

LMVF.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

5.00%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

11.81%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

20.66%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

19.84%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

19.65%

-2.04%