LMUB vs. DCMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LMUB (iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LMUB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free US Long National Municipal Index, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. LMUB is passively managed, while DCMT is actively managed. Over the past year, LMUB returned 9.37% vs 42.19% for DCMT. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. LMUB charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

LMUB vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMUB achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 34.49% return.

LMUB

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 9.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DCMT

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -2.89%
• YTD: 34.49%
• 6M: 33.53%
• 1Y: 42.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMUB vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LMUB iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF	2.32%	3.52%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	34.49%	2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LMUB and DCMT is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025	-0.23

Return for Risk

LMUB vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMUB

LMUB Risk / Return Rank: 68
LMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
LMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 60

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 76
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMUB vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LMUB	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.32	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	3.01	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.41	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	6.83	-3.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.61	16.31	-5.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LMUB vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMUB Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMUB and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LMUB	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.32	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	1.20	-0.38

Drawdowns

LMUB vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMUB drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMUB and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMUB	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-11.95%	+6.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	-6.21%	+3.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.46%	+3.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	-3.13%	+1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	2.59%	-1.70%

Volatility

LMUB vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) is 1.44%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that LMUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMUB	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.44%	6.71%	-5.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.05%	15.87%	-12.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.21%	18.27%	-14.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.97%	15.77%	-9.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.97%	15.77%	-9.80%

LMUB vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMUB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMUB vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

LMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than DCMT's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.73%	3.67%	1.59%
LMUB iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF	3.77%	3.14%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMUB and DCMT in my portfolio?

LMUB and DCMT have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMUB or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to LMUB (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMUB dropped -5.51% vs DCMT's -11.95%.

Which ETF is better, LMUB or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 42.19% vs 9.37% for LMUB. On fees, LMUB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LMUB has been the lower-risk option at 1.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LMUB or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 42.19% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LMUB or DCMT?

LMUB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LMUB or DCMT?

LMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 2.73% for DCMT.

What is the main difference between LMUB and DCMT?

LMUB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LMUB and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.