LMUB vs. COMT
LMUB (iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LMUB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free US Long National Municipal Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. LMUB is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. Over the past year, LMUB returned 9.37% vs 47.51% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. LMUB charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
LMUB vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMUB achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
LMUB
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
LMUB vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMUB iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF | 2.32% | 3.52% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 3.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMUB and COMT is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMUB vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
LMUB
COMT
LMUB vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMUB | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.40 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 5.95 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.61 | 14.11 | -3.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMUB | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.24 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.20 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
LMUB vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMUB drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMUB and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMUB | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -51.89% | +46.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | -8.02% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.82% | +4.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -24.07% | +22.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 3.38% | -2.49% |
Volatility
LMUB vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) is 1.44%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that LMUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMUB | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 7.37% | -5.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 18.80% | -15.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 21.29% | -17.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 21.06% | -15.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 18.89% | -12.92% |
LMUB vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMUB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMUB vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
LMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
LMUB iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF | 3.77% | 3.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMUB and COMT have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to LMUB (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMUB dropped -5.51% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 9.37% for LMUB. On fees, LMUB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LMUB has been the lower-risk option at 1.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LMUB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 3.77% for LMUB.
LMUB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while COMT is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LMUB and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMUB and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer