LMTL vs. NVDU
LMTL (Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF) and NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Both are actively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LMTL charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for NVDU.
Performance
LMTL vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMTL achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than NVDU's 24.68% return.
LMTL
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDU
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- 21.27%
- YTD
- 24.68%
- 6M
- 26.89%
- 1Y
- 90.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMTL vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMTL Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF | 8.57% | 20.61% |
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 24.68% | -1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMTL and NVDU is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMTL vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank
LMTL
NVDU
LMTL vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF (LMTL) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMTL | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 1.17 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
LMTL vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMTL drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, smaller than the maximum NVDU drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMTL and NVDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMTL | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -67.27% | +21.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.02% | -15.08% | -27.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -18.83% | +5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.50% | — |
Volatility
LMTL vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMTL | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.78% | 67.91% | -19.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.78% | 91.02% | -42.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.78% | 91.02% | -42.24% |
LMTL vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMTL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMTL vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison
LMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than NVDU's 4.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LMTL Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF | 3.47% | 3.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 4.65% | 5.68% | 16.85% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMTL and NVDU have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for LMTL.
NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 3.47% for LMTL.
Their fees differ too: 1.07% for LMTL and 1.04% for NVDU.
Find the right allocation for LMTL and NVDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer