LMTL vs. BEX
LMTL (Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF) and BEX (Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. LMTL charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for BEX.
Performance
LMTL vs. BEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LMTL
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -7.59%
- 6M
- -13.45%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEX
- 1D
- -9.39%
- 1M
- -16.38%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMTL vs. BEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LMTL Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF | -4.71% |
BEX Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | -50.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMTL and BEX is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMTL vs. BEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF (LMTL) and Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMTL vs. BEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMTL drawdown since its inception was -49.46%, smaller than the maximum BEX drawdown of -55.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMTL and BEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMTL | BEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.46% | -55.26% | +5.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.43% | -55.26% | +11.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.69% | -28.37% | +11.68% |
Volatility
LMTL vs. BEX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMTL | BEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.11% | 227.12% | -176.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.11% | 227.12% | -176.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.11% | 227.12% | -176.01% |
LMTL vs. BEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMTL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BEX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMTL vs. BEX - Dividend Comparison
LMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, while BEX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BEX Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMTL Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF | 4.23% | 3.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMTL and BEX have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LMTL is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LMTL is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BEX.
LMTL has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.00% for BEX.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for LMTL and 1.30% for BEX.
Find the right allocation for LMTL and BEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer