PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMSMX vs. MDVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMSMX vs. MDVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMSMX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than MDVAX's 2.47% return.


LMSMX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.20%
1Y
7.35%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
-2.04%
10Y*

MDVAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.73%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.70%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
2.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMSMX vs. MDVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMSMX
Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund
0.85%12.15%-1.72%5.13%-23.44%-2.32%12.86%7.71%1.46%5.52%
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
2.47%8.40%2.47%5.81%-17.01%1.95%8.08%10.12%-1.55%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LMSMX and MDVAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.82

The correlation between LMSMX and MDVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMSMX vs. MDVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMSMX
LMSMX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
LMSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LMSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MDVAX
MDVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MDVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MDVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMSMX vs. MDVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMSMXMDVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.51

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.76

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

15.86

-7.43

LMSMX vs. MDVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the MDVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMSMX and MDVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMSMXMDVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.54

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.05

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.71

-0.54

Drawdowns

LMSMX vs. MDVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMSMX drawdown since its inception was -30.76%, which is greater than MDVAX's maximum drawdown of -23.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSMX and MDVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMSMXMDVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.76%

-23.02%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.64%

-2.21%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.50%

-5.44%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.18%

-23.02%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.77%

-3.49%

-9.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-3.47%

-6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.52%

+0.47%

Volatility

LMSMX vs. MDVAX - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX) at 0.95%. This indicates that LMSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMSMXMDVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

0.95%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

2.17%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.40%

3.28%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.38%

6.46%

+3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.16%

5.27%

+2.89%

LMSMX vs. MDVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMSMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MDVAX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMSMX vs. MDVAX - Dividend Comparison

LMSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than MDVAX's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMSMX
Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund
4.41%4.20%5.24%4.68%3.40%3.78%6.84%7.19%3.18%3.24%0.00%0.00%
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
3.99%3.91%2.45%4.87%3.76%4.06%7.20%2.90%2.86%2.64%2.11%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMSMX and MDVAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMSMX has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to MDVAX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMSMX dropped -30.76% vs MDVAX's -23.02%.

MDVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMSMX and MDVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer