LMP.L vs. LI.PA
LMP.L (LondonMetric Property plc) and LI.PA (Klepierre SA) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — LMP.L in REIT - Diversified, LI.PA in REIT - Retail. Over the past 10 years, LMP.L returned 7.29%/yr vs 4.78%/yr for LI.PA. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LMP.L vs. LI.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LMP.L is traded in GBp, while LI.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LI.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMP.L achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly lower than LI.PA's 11.86% return. Over the past 10 years, LMP.L has outperformed LI.PA with an annualized return of 7.29%, while LI.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.78% annualized return.
LMP.L
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- -0.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
LI.PA
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 6M
- 11.93%
- 1Y
- 20.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.98%
- 5Y*
- 18.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
LMP.L vs. LI.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMP.L LondonMetric Property plc | 3.47% | 12.48% | -0.43% | 17.21% | -36.54% | 28.33% | 0.54% | 41.57% | -2.30% | 25.29% |
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 11.86% | 35.55% | 15.73% | 21.87% | 17.46% | 6.66% | -39.01% | 22.59% | -21.31% | 7.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMP.L and LI.PA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2013 | 0.44 |
The correlation between LMP.L and LI.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.52 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMP.L vs. LI.PA — Risk / Return Rank
LMP.L
LI.PA
LMP.L vs. LI.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) and Klepierre SA (LI.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMP.L | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.21 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 1.76 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 3.94 | -4.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMP.L vs. LI.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMP.L drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, smaller than the maximum LI.PA drawdown of -69.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMP.L and LI.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMP.L | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.13% | -69.56% | +27.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.39% | -11.23% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.22% | -12.10% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.56% | -24.94% | -16.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.13% | -69.46% | +27.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.35% | -0.26% | -14.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -19.06% | +8.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.08% | 5.05% | +3.03% |
Volatility
LMP.L vs. LI.PA - Volatility Comparison
LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Klepierre SA (LI.PA) at 4.75%. This indicates that LMP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LI.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMP.L | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 4.75% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | 13.92% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 17.01% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 26.10% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 35.39% | -11.74% |
Dividends
LMP.L vs. LI.PA - Dividend Comparison
LMP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than LI.PA's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 5.05% | 5.48% | 6.47% | 7.09% | 7.90% | 0.00% | 5.98% | 3.10% | 7.27% | 4.96% | 4.55% | 3.90% |
LMP.L LondonMetric Property plc | 6.56% | 6.54% | 6.16% | 5.07% | 5.48% | 3.12% | 3.71% | 3.55% | 4.60% | 4.09% | 4.73% | 3.35% |
Financials
LMP.L vs. LI.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LondonMetric Property plc and Klepierre SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LMP.L and LI.PA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LMP.L and LI.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer