LMP.L vs. CLILF
LMP.L (LondonMetric Property plc) and CLILF (CapitaLand Investment Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — LMP.L in REIT - Diversified, CLILF in Real Estate - Services. Over the past 3 years, LMP.L returned 7.66%/yr vs -7.02%/yr for CLILF. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
LMP.L vs. CLILF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LMP.L is traded in GBp, while CLILF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLILF values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMP.L achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than CLILF's 7.04% return.
LMP.L
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 5.75%
- 1Y
- -0.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 6.71%
CLILF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -4.82%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 33.34%
- 1Y
- 16.43%
- 3Y*
- -7.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMP.L vs. CLILF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMP.L LondonMetric Property plc | 1.18% | 12.48% | -0.43% | 17.21% | -36.54% | 11.60% |
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 7.04% | -9.97% | 0.64% | -27.73% | 18.60% | -0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMP.L and CLILF is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021 | -0.09 |
The correlation between LMP.L and CLILF shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.02 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LMP.L:
£4.32B
CLILF:
$7.72B
LMP.L:
£0.28
CLILF:
SGD 0.05
LMP.L:
6.55
CLILF:
52.17
LMP.L:
4.86
CLILF:
3.93
LMP.L:
0.92
CLILF:
0.79
LMP.L:
£867.40M
CLILF:
SGD 2.91B
LMP.L:
£854.10M
CLILF:
SGD 2.22B
LMP.L:
£828.60M
CLILF:
SGD 153.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMP.L vs. CLILF — Risk / Return Rank
LMP.L
CLILF
LMP.L vs. CLILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) and CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMP.L | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.22 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.60 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 1.16 | -1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMP.L vs. CLILF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMP.L drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, smaller than the maximum CLILF drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMP.L and CLILF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMP.L | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.13% | -67.75% | +25.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.39% | -28.42% | +13.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.22% | -47.65% | +31.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.25% | -56.96% | +40.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.16% | -44.57% | +34.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.81% | 14.60% | -6.79% |
Volatility
LMP.L vs. CLILF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) is 5.08%, while CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a volatility of 9.83%. This indicates that LMP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMP.L | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 9.83% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.47% | 54.45% | -39.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 62.47% | -44.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 80.10% | -55.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 80.10% | -55.98% |
Dividends
LMP.L vs. CLILF - Dividend Comparison
LMP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than CLILF's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 3.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMP.L LondonMetric Property plc | 6.71% | 6.54% | 6.16% | 5.07% | 5.48% | 3.12% | 3.71% | 3.55% | 4.60% | 4.09% | 4.73% | 3.35% |
Financials
LMP.L vs. CLILF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LondonMetric Property plc and CapitaLand Investment Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LMP.L vs. CLILF - Profitability Comparison
LMP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a gross profit of 233.80M and revenue of 238.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.9%.
CLILF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
LMP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported an operating income of 217.10M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 90.9%.
CLILF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
LMP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a net income of 165.40M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in a net margin of 69.2%.
CLILF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMP.L and CLILF have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LMP.L and CLILF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer