PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMNX vs. SBU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMNX vs. SBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF (LMNX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMNX achieves a -62.00% return, which is significantly lower than SBU's 21.72% return.


LMNX

1D
-17.92%
1M
-12.57%
YTD
-62.00%
6M
-66.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SBU

1D
0.85%
1M
-16.51%
YTD
21.72%
6M
11.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMNX vs. SBU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LMNX and SBU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMNX vs. SBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF (LMNX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LMNX vs. SBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMNXSBUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

0.71

-0.96

Drawdowns

LMNX vs. SBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMNX drawdown since its inception was -78.77%, which is greater than SBU's maximum drawdown of -28.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMNX and SBU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMNXSBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.77%

-28.10%

-50.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.22%

-20.00%

-58.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.90%

-6.56%

-34.34%

Volatility

LMNX vs. SBU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMNXSBUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

173.88%

59.78%

+114.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

173.88%

59.78%

+114.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

173.88%

59.78%

+114.10%

LMNX vs. SBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMNX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SBU's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMNX vs. SBU - Dividend Comparison

Neither LMNX nor SBU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LMNX and SBU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SBU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for LMNX.

LMNX and SBU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for LMNX and 0.75% for SBU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMNX and SBU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer