LMNX vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LMNX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LMNX charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

LMNX vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF (LMNX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMNX achieves a -55.70% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 780.13% return.

LMNX

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: -55.70%
• 6M: -64.25%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: -26.45%
• 1M: 69.00%
• YTD: 780.13%
• 6M: 832.94%
• 1Y: 3,622.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMNX vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LMNX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF	-55.70%	55.19%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	780.13%	94.06%

Correlation

The correlation between LMNX and MULL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

LMNX vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMNX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 98
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMNX vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF (LMNX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMNX	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	25.24	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.61	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.71	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	69.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	221.31	—

Drawdowns

LMNX vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMNX drawdown since its inception was -79.62%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMNX and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMNX	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.62%	-72.29%	-7.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.61%	-26.45%	-48.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.60%	-20.52%	-23.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.58%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LMNX	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	74.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	119.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	169.75%	145.72%	+24.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	169.75%	142.49%	+27.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	169.75%	142.49%	+27.26%

LMNX vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMNX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMNX vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

LMNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025
LMNX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMNX and MULL in my portfolio?

LMNX and MULL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LMNX or MULL?

On fees, LMNX is cheaper at 1.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LMNX or MULL?

LMNX is cheaper with a 1.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LMNX or MULL?

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for LMNX.

What is the main difference between LMNX and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for LMNX and 1.50% for MULL.